Which of the following methods is used by the Board to impose disciplinary action?

The Board employs various methods to impose disciplinary action, and one of the most significant is the revocation of licenses and the imposition of fines. This approach serves multiple purposes: it protects the public by ensuring that only qualified and compliant individuals can practice, it deters future violations by imposing financial penalties, and it maintains the integrity of the profession.

Revoking a license typically occurs in cases of egregious behavior or repeated violations, which ensures that individuals who are not adhering to the professional standards set forth by the Board cannot continue practicing. Imposing fines adds an additional layer of accountability, making it clear that violations have tangible consequences.

Other methods, such as issuing public reprimands and requiring additional training, while useful in certain circumstances, may not carry the same weight or serve as a strong enough deterrent for serious infractions. Similarly, seeking prosecution in criminal court is outside the usual regulatory purview of the Board and is typically reserved for more severe legal transgressions, rather than for enforcement of professional standards. Thus, the combination of revoking licenses and imposing fines is the most comprehensive approach for maintaining professional standards and public safety.